The Stuttering Source
  • Blog
  • Forms/Brochures
  • Media
  • Resources
  • National Therapy Center
  • Contact

One Size Does NOT Fit All

3/9/2015

4 Comments

 
Picture
Speech Pathology Australia (SPA), Australia's professional organization for speech-language pathologists (SLPs), recently submitted a proposal that suggests that SLPs working in clinics run by the Australian government must be trained in the Lidcombe Program in order to treat pre-school aged children who stutter.  SPA is also supporting legislation that would extend this mandate to private practitioners and require them to provide the Lidcombe Program in order to be reimbursed by Medicare.  Although the SPA’s intentions may be to increase access to treatment for young children who stutter, we must not overlook the ramifications of having the government and private insurance companies intervene with clinical decision-making.  

The first thing to consider is that there are multiple factors that are known to contribute to the onset of stuttering.  Each child has a unique set of abilities and vulnerabilities that determine if and how stuttering is going to persist. Those different circumstances demand different approaches to treatment.  A speech pathologist cannot be expected to develop a treatment plan that is specifically tailored to the client when the SPA is using Medicare reimbursement to limit them to one approach. Speech pathologists could be faced with the unfortunate dilemma of deciding whether to use an approach that best fits the child and families’ needs or to use the approach that will get reimbursed. 

We must also consider that although this mandate is exclusively impacting children who stutter in Australia, it has the potential to set a precedent for how all communication disorders are reimbursed by the government and private insurance companies across the world.  Clinicians who focus on disorders, such as Childhood Apraxia of Speech or feeding/swallowing disorders, must think about the ramifications of being limited to one single approach to treating their clients as well.  Jane Fraser, the President of the Stuttering Foundation of America, released a statement concerning SPA's proposal to the to the Australian Government.  "We can’t imagine a policy that limits a cardiologist, an oncologist, or a surgeon by controlling reimbursements to one single approach for all patients -- why limit Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs)?" 

Finally, the decision of the SPA to restrict SLPs to one treatment approach has the potential to negatively impact the future of stuttering research. We must not hinder research or the recognition of new and effective clinical approaches by mandating the use of one existing approach.  Organizations such as the SPA and the American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) were developed to ensure that our field matures and moves forward, however a mandate such as this will only hold us back.

If this policy is accepted, its impact has the potential to extend well past the country it is originating in and beyond the disorder it is addressing.  Although this is occurring thousands of miles away, it is imperative that we voice our concerns about this issue now to make certain that our field continues to advance our knowledge of communication disorders and to ensure that the families we treat receive individualized and comprehensive care.  

If you share in the concerns expressed above, please let Speech Pathology Australia know by contacting policy@speechpathologyaustralia.org.au! 


*This entry was also featured on ADVANCE magazine's blog.  



UPDATE May 14, 2015: The Australian Government has turned down SPA's proposal.  Thank you to all of the SLPs and parent who have spoken up to educate SPA on the ramifications of their request for program-specific funding.  We hope that SPA can work with stuttering specialists to develop a more well-rounded proposal to benefit children who stutter.  
4 Comments
Melissa Petersen link
3/11/2015 05:07:10 am

How concerning! Thanks for sharing about that. I hope the legislation does not pass!

Reply
Brooke Leiman link
3/12/2015 08:31:53 am

Melissa- it truly is! Craig Coleman has also wrote a piece on this for ASHAsphere if you'd like to check that out. I'm sure he'd love to hear from other ASHA members that feel the same way as we do!

Reply
Emily Kraus
7/23/2017 10:00:27 pm

Thank you for sharing about this! It is truly concerning that a professional organization would back one specific program rather than leaving the decision making in the hands of the capable professionals they oversee. I have learned a lot about the Lidcombe program recently, but certainly one program cannot fit the needs of every fluency case on an SLP's caseload. Do you believe that we should be concerned about other professional organizations following a similar path? In your experience, how effective has the Lidcombe program been? What other programs have you used that you recommend?

Reply
Brooke Leiman
8/8/2017 10:53:58 pm

Hi Emily!

The best we can do is stay alert and engaged in healthcare policy! As for the Lidcombe program, I was trained by the consortium and I, myself, have strong concerns with many of the main features of the program. There are some aspects that I can agree with, like the importance of parent involvement, but that is a common ingredient in many approaches for young children who stutter. I don't subscribe to any one approach because children who stutter are such a heterogenous population. However, when learning more about treating young children who stutter I would recommend researching the Palin Parent Child Interaction Program and the Parent Child Training Program developed by Scott Yaruss and Craig Coleman (you can find hand outs from this one at http://www.stutteringcenter.org/stuttering-center-forms.html).

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Brooke Leiman MA, CCC-SLP, BCS-F Director of the Stuttering Clinic at National Therapy Center
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    May 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    March 2016
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    August 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013

    Posts

    All
    Advertising
    Avoidance
    Famous People Who Stutter
    Feelings/Emotions
    Other Fluency Disorders
    Parents Of Preschoolers
    Parents Of School Aged Children
    Social Situations
    Speech Pathologists
    Speech Tools
    Students
    Teens And Adults

    Picture
    Picture
    DISCLAIMER: The purpose of this website is to act as an educational aid and address common topics associated with stuttering.  It is not intended to replace the need for services provided by a licensed speech pathologist who can tailor treatment to an  individual's needs.  
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.